2012 Arctic Cat Sno Pro® 500 Links
2012 Arctic Cat Sno Pro® 500 Specifications
Identification | |
---|---|
Model Type | Performance |
BASE MSRP(US) | $8,599.00 |
Warranty | 12 |
Engine: | |
Engine Brand Name | Suzuki |
Engine Type | Horizontal In-line |
Cylinders | 2 |
Engine Stroke | 2-Stroke |
Horsepower (bhp/kW) | 84 / 62.7 |
Cooling | Liquid |
Valve Configuration | Reed Valve |
Bore (mm/in) | 71 / 2.8 |
Stroke (mm/in) | 63 / 2.48 |
Displacement (cc/ci) | 499 / 30.4 |
Starter | Pull |
Fuel Requirements | Regular |
Fuel Type | Gas / Oil Injected |
Turbocharged | No |
Supercharged | No |
Fuel Injector | Yes |
Fuel Injector Size (mm) | 38 |
Carburetor | No |
Carburetion Type | Fuel Injected |
Speed Governor | No |
Kill Switch / Tether Cord | Standard |
Emergency Engine Shut-Off | Standard |
Sound Reduction | Standard |
Transmission: | |
Transmission Type | Continuously Variable (CVT) |
Primary Drive (Rear Wheel) | Belt |
Primary Drive (Engine / Transmission) | Belt |
Reverse | Yes |
Throttle Type | Thumb |
Brakes: | |
Rear Brake Type | Hydraulic Disc |
Suspension: | |
Front Suspension Type | Independent Double Wishbone |
Front Travel (in/mm) | 9.5 / 241.3 |
Front Suspension Brand Name | AWS VIII |
Front Stabilizer Bar | Yes |
Adjustment Type | Spring Mounted Adjustment |
Rear Travel (in/mm) | 13.5 / 342.9 |
Number Rear Shock Absorbers | 2 |
Rear Stabilizer Bar | No |
Front Shock Absorber Brand | Fox® Zero Pro |
Front Shock Absorber Type | Gas IFP Shock |
Coil Over Shock | Yes |
Rear Shock Absorber Brand | Fox® |
Rear Shock Absorber Type | Gas IFP Shock |
Center Shock Absorber Brand | Fox® |
Center Shock Absorber Type | Gas IFP Shock |
Steering: | |
Steering Type | Manual |
Steering Control | Handlebar |
Technical Specifications: | |
Length (ft) | 9.75 |
Width (in/mm) | 48 / 1219.2 |
Maximum Ski Stance (in/mm) | 43 / 1092.2 |
Minimum Ski Stance (in/mm) | 43 / 1092.2 |
Length (ft/ft) | 9 |
Length (ft/in) | 9 |
Weight | Standard |
Fuel Capacity (gal/l) | 11 / 41.6 |
Performance | Standard |
Seats: | |
Seat Type | One-Piece |
Adjustable | No |
Seat Material | Vinyl |
Seat Location | Driver |
Number Of Seats | 1 |
Exterior: | |
Frame | Aluminum |
Body Material | Plastic |
Floor Board Location | Driver |
Skid Resistant | Yes |
Hand Grips | Standard |
Saddle Bag Guard | No |
Snow Guard | Yes |
Side Cover | No |
Handlebars | Standard |
Front Bumper | Standard |
Rear Bumper | Standard |
Skid Plate | Standard |
Handlebar Hooks | Standard |
Ski Material | Plastic |
Ski Handle | Standard |
Skag Material | Carbide |
Instrumentation: | |
Digital Instrumentation | Standard |
Tachometer | Standard |
Trip Odometer | Standard |
Speedometer | Standard |
Temperature Warning Type | Light |
Fuel Level Warning Type | Gauge |
Pricing: | |
Warranty (Months/Condition) | 12 / Limited |
Identification: | |
Generic Type (Primary) | Performance |
Manufacturer Country | USA |
Introduction Year | 2010 |
Parent Company | Arctic Cat |
Display Name | Sno Pro® 500 |
Mounts: | |
Tool Bag Mount | Standard |
Windshield Mounts | Standard |
Drive Line: | |
Track Brand | Hacksaw |
Track Length (in/mm) | 128 / 3251.2 |
Track Width (in/mm) | 15 / 381 |
Lug Height (in/mm) | 1 / 31.8 |
Number Of Tracks | 1 |
Glass: | |
Height Adjustable | No |
Tinted | Yes |
Heated | No |
Height | Low |
Lights: | |
Halogen Headlight (s) | Standard |
Headlight (s) | Standard |
Type | Halogen |
Convenience: | |
Heated Hand Grip Location | Driver |
Adjustable | Yes |
Paint & Finish: | |
Metallic | No |
Decal Kit | Standard |
Agree, Disagree?
Write a Review and rate the 2012 Arctic Cat Sno Pro® 500. Your review and rating will help rank 2012 Performance.
Write a Review and rate the 2012 Arctic Cat Sno Pro® 500. Your review and rating will help rank 2012 Performance.
View all Reviews2008 Can-Am Spyder Roadster Reviews
Great trail sled
Apr. 29, 2012
This sled excels at performance trail riding. Lots of adjustability to set up for the handling you prefer. Even with limited power this snowmobile uses all it has well. Making it a hard sled to keep up with. I have noticed 12-14 mpg using the recommend 87 octane. I beleave better mpg can be achieved...
Read Full Review
- 1-1 of 1 Reviews